Friday, November 10, 2023

πŸŒŠπŸ’» Modeling Pressurized Pipes in InfoWorks ICM: A Technical Insight by Innovyze πŸ› ️πŸ”¬

 πŸŒŠπŸ’» Modeling Pressurized Pipes in InfoWorks ICM: A Technical Insight by Innovyze πŸ› ️πŸ”¬

πŸ“ Location: Innovyze, Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BA, United Kingdom
πŸ“ž Contact: +44 (01491) 821400 | πŸ“§ support@innovyze.com
πŸ”— Website: www.innovyze.com


πŸ“œ Technical Paper - February 2013

🌟 Introduction

  • A challenge in Modeling: Correct modeling of pressurized pipes, known as forcemains or rising mains, poses significant challenges in the model-building process. πŸ—️
  • Transition Issue: The key difficulty lies in finding equations to represent the transition from free surface flow (like open channels or partially full pipes) to pressurized flow (fully full pipes). This flow can be intermittent (as in storm pipes during rainfall) or constant (as in pumped systems or siphons). πŸ’¦⚖️

πŸ•³️ Preissmann Slot Approximation

  • Representation Technique: Pipes that are typically free surface and occasionally surcharged are modeled using the Preissmann Slot approximation. πŸ“
  • Slot Functionality: This technique involves a narrow slot running the length of the pipe, allowing for the maintenance of a free surface and avoiding transition issues. 🚰

πŸŒ€ Pressurized Pipe Modeling Challenges

  • Not Suitable for Heavily Surcharged Pipes: The Preissmann slot isn't recommended for pipes that are permanently or heavily surcharged due to overprediction of flow attenuation and underprediction of headloss. 🌧️🚫
  • Solution Models: Two model options are available - ‘Pressure’ or ‘ForceMain’ - each with unique characteristics to suit different scenarios. πŸ”„

🌐 Forcemain Solution: A Detailed Example

  • Complex Arrangements: The example illustrates a complex forcemain system, traversing hills, requiring careful modeling to maintain full pipes throughout the simulation. 🏞️πŸ”§
  • Siphoning Effect: The hydraulic profile shows how part of the system acts as a siphon, which can be altered by using sealed manholes instead of break nodes to simulate air valves. πŸŒͺ️

πŸ“ˆ Result Comparisons and Good Practices

  • Flow Characteristics: Comparison of flow results in different setups (with and without air valves) reveals the impact on pump characteristics and flow attenuation. πŸ’§πŸ”
  • Best Practices: A summary of best practices includes using break nodes at key junctions, representing air valves with sealed manholes, and ensuring proper initialization. ✅πŸ“Š

πŸ“Œ General Points to Note:

  • Multiple Pumps and Forcemains: These principles are also applicable to systems with multiple pumps and forcemains. πŸ”„
  • Attention to Detail: Challenges such as positive gradient in pressure pipes and ensuring full initialization are critical for accurate modeling. 🎯
  • Headloss Types: Only ‘fixed’ or ‘none’ headloss types should be used in pressurized pipes for accurate representation. πŸ“‰

πŸ“š Conclusion

In summary, modeling pressurized pipes in InfoWorks ICM requires careful consideration of flow characteristics and pipe conditions. Innovyze provides a thoughtful approach to tackling these complexities, ensuring accurate and reliable modeling for urban water systems. πŸŒ†πŸ’§

No comments:

Emoji EPANET2.2 Reference Table

  Author(s) Year Title Emoji Bhave 1991 Analysis of Flow in Water Distribution Networks πŸ“˜ Clark, R.M. 1998 Chlorine demand and Trihalometha...