Here is a table comparing some of the key features and capabilities of InfoWater Pro and EPANET:
| Feature | InfoWater Pro | EPANET |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Water distribution network analysis and design | Water distribution network analysis and design |
| Platform | Windows | Windows, Linux, MacOS |
| Programming language | C++ | C |
| License | Commercial | Open source (GNU GPL) |
| Input data formats | GIS layers, hydraulic profiles, demand patterns, and other data | Pipe layout, elevation data, and other data |
| Output data formats | Results and reports in various formats (e.g. maps, charts, tables) | Results and reports in various formats (e.g. maps, charts, tables) |
| Analysis capabilities | Water quality, energy, fire flow, water hammer, and other analyses | Water quality, energy, fire flow, and other analyses |
| Network modeling approach | Network model | Network model |
| Hydraulic solver | EPANET-based solver or Giswater-based solver | EPANET-based solver |
| Network visualization | 3D visualization, GIS integration, and other visualization options | 2D visualization and other visualization options |
| Additional features | Optimization, real-time monitoring, and other advanced features | Customization, scripting, and other advanced features |
As this table illustrates, both InfoWater Pro and EPANET offer a range of capabilities for analyzing and designing water distribution networks. Ultimately, the choice between the two tools will depend on the specific needs and goals of the user, as well as factors such as the platform, programming language, license, and additional features that are most relevant to their project.
